The State ought to be blocked by equitable estoppel from prosecuting Kyle Rittenhouse for this or any other crime as it has already taken the position that he was a child on the date that he committed any acts that it wants to prosecute him for. Ironically, Kyle is looking at a life sentence for not being able to deescalate a conflict that he entered well enough for the State’s liking, while as a minor the State would force him into a conflict ridden environment known as public school almost every day and not allow him to use the gold standard of deescalation- walking away. The State also forces young adults who’s parents are on the opposite end of the spectrum from Kyle’s parents (who presumably allow him to possess AR 15s) to remain in conflict ridden environments literally all the time, apply general rules of battery to the young adult and not the instigator, and take away the obvious solution of walking away from the conflict. Then the State has the audacity to feign surprise and offense when a young adult decides to place themselves in a situation where conflict is foreseeable. If the State actually believed the Kyle was a child then the appropriate response from them would be to treat him as a missing child and attempt to find his parents. It did not occur to the cops to do this because, aside from all obvious issues with cops, they do not actually believe that Kyle and other 17 year olds are children.
In order to sustain anarchy “we” will have to sustain functional families, and in order to sustain healthy families “we” have to know how to get a family in the first place. Linear time progression dictates that this starts with finding a spouse. I’ve seen women make four main mistakes when they were trying to obtain a husband: not stating your goals upfront, trying to duplicate gender roles, allowing themselves to be interviewed for too long, and falling out of the interview mindset. In my experience, most women start out looking for a family and either it is scared out of them by parents or they have given up by the time men get good and ready to act surprised that there are no good women left.
Dating is an interview process and it should be viewed as such. It doesn’t have to be a bland interview process, but it shouldn’t be treated as a good time with no end goal. You are interviewing the father of your future children. And you are completely responsible for the choice you make, unless you live in a country/culture where you are essentially sex trafficked to your “spouse.” So you should treat the interview process seriously. Yes, you should absolutely have a compatible personality and love the person who you pick for this role. People who are not fit to be the father of your children who you love and want to spend time with are called friends. Do not let anyone talk you out of this mindset if you are just starting out. If you are tired of it all, get back in this mindset.
This episode is not about anarchy itself. It is about the type of society that we TM will have to sustain once we TM get anarchy. Even if anarchy is never achieved, it is still beneficial to create a more functional culture. The State has made it abundantly clear that the thing it fears most is intact, functional family units. That is why it created welfare in an attempt to make fathers obsolete. That is why it claimed marriage for itself, only to turn about and add an exit clause in the event that you feel like it.That is why it offers childcare in the form of public schools so that it can shape children into whatever is most conducive to its expansion at the time. With all that newly found free time, it is why it created Affirmative Action, which largely “benefits” women, to solidify mothers’ absence from the home. DOE controlled training for many jobs is one year of training and three years of bs for a reason. Karl Marx spends a large part of The Communist Manifesto laying out his ideas for how to dissolve the family structure. As evil as the State is, none of these programs would be effective if people didn’t go along with them.
And we never were. All pleas that we should act a certain way or, more often, support a certain subset of degenerate behavior are now conclusively proven to be disingenuous.
The injunction on enforcing the new definition of the public charge rule has been lifted. The case has yet to be finally decided. Although the US Federal Government is not going to apply ANYTHING in a sane and efficient manner or without committing thefts, the rule, AS WRITTEN, is not an act of aggression.
Excerpts from Draft Dodging Case Law Continue reading Total Anarchy Episode 6: Draft Dodging